deloptes, on 2019-10-03: > Gerard ROBIN wrote: > > >> What exactly bugs you about the signed kernel? The kernel is so big > >> that the extra signatures hardly make a difference. > > I read somewhere that the signed kernel was for the "secure boot" of > > microsoft and I have nothing of microsoft on my machine, so that's why > > I installed the unsigned kernel. > > does someone know if signed is needed for UEFI to work properly in some > configurations? Good day deloptes, I don't know if someone else hit some other corner base, but signed kernels, bootloaders, drivers, and the like are only required if one wishes to, or has to, boot with UEFI Secure Boot enabled. That's the only configuration I can think of where it would be needed. Kind Regards, :) -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> Fingerprint: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54 2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature