On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:38:42AM -0400, rhkramer@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, October 17, 2019 05:25:46 AM tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225 > > > > Sorry. That link forces you through Twitter. Here are better > > ones: > > > > https://old.lwn.net/Articles/784758/ > > > > https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cisco-botches-fix-for-rv320 > > -rv325-routers-just-blocks-curl-user-agent/ > > After readiing (or skimming, as the case may be), some of these links, I have > a few reactions (after LMAO). They're not the only ones. This is not the only Cisco messup. This is "industry standard". Unfortunately. > I am disappointed that this was not more widely publicized at the time (or > even now) (I hadn't heard about it, or didn't understand it until now). Well, read LWN (shameless plug). And consider supporting them. > Cisco should be a laughingstock [...] We wouldn't come out of laughing, those messups are so numerous... Cheers -- t
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature