Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
I used tesseract-ocr, mentioned previously, a couple of years ago with
very good success. Also, the problem he's trying to solve is much
what means very good success? You had to proof read it at the end - time
spent. For me either something works or it doesn't none of them worked even
close to good
simpler than the general OCR problem; he's got the actual correct pixels
(rather than a scan), and maybe even have knowledge of what fonts are
used. That makes a huge difference.
I doubt it - really! Let me know at the end. I am curious.
regards