Re: xsane: incoherent behaviours
On Wed 31 Jul 2019 at 20:18:09 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Brian wrote:
> > You are misunderstanding. When I said "Neither should have an envy photo
> > 7100 entry in models.dat.", I meant that the *stretch* models.dat does
> > not have it as an entry. If it is there, it has been put there - and not
> > by anything which a stretch inastallation would do.
> - the stretch models.dat does not have an envy entry ==> envy is not seen, and
> of course scanning is not available
> - now, it is there because I put it ==> envy is seen, and scanning works
> do you see an other solution?
But you said your was laptop amd64/stretch; it wasn't. models.dat had
been altered at some time by you. You failed to mention that.