[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: HTTP shimmed to HTTPS.



*	From: "D. R. Evans" doc.evans@gmail.com
*	Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:01:22 -0600
> That doesn't seem to be correct. The original e-mail said:
>> Jul 16 11:25:16 joule stunnel: LOG5[4]: Service [https] accepted connection from 127.0.0.1:36140
>
> So 36140 is the source port.

I wondered about that also but my understanding is sketchy.
Perhaps Reco didn't mean what he typed.  =8~|

> It's typical behaviour of IP-based clients to choose a "random" [usually
> uniformly distributed within some range] unused high port number for sending,
> and they'll (for most protocols) listen for replies on that same number. In
> general, one can't attach any meaning to the number: it was simply free for
> the client to use.

Random port numbers?  According to 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers 443 is 
the port for HTTPS, recognized as official by IANA. If a browser asks 
for https://x.y.z:443/path why change to https://x.y.z:36140/path?

Thanks, (I guess),             ... P.



-- 
https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Oberon
Tel: +1 604 670 0140            Bcc: peter at easthope. ca


Reply to: