[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: build vs install



On 09/04/2019 19:03, Lee wrote:
On 4/9/19, Michael Howard wrote:
On 09/04/2019 16:35, Lee wrote:
What are the downsides to getting the source code and doing the
build/install myself vs. using a pre-built package other than I'm
responsible for noticing the software needs to be updated?

The latest example is ttcp
    http://nuttcp.net/nuttcp/latest/  has 8.1.4
    https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/nuttcp  has 6.1.2-4

If I ever decide to go with the debian package I just uninstall the
software I built and .. anything else that needs to be done before
installing an official package?

TIA
Lee

You could build a debian package from the source and let apt take care
of install/updates/uninstall. Admittedly, it could be a bit of work
initially with versions so far apart as above but it is an option.
That's an interesting idea.  Get the debian stuff from
   https://packages.debian.org/stretch/nuttcp
and see which patches still apply to the current version of the software.

But I'm missing what letting apt take care of
install/updates/uninstall gets me since I'd be the one creating &
updating the home-built package.

It's simply a case that apt then knows that ttcp is installed and at what version in case of conflicts or security aspects etc. If you simply do a ./configure && make && make install or what not, apt has no idea what you've done.

--
Mike Howard


Reply to: