Re: i386 version for chrome
Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Saturday 27 October 2018 09:58:45 Curt wrote:
>
>root@coyote:/home/gene/Downloads# dpkg -i
>vivaldi-stable_2.1.1337.36-1_i386.deb
>Selecting previously unselected package vivaldi-stable.
>(Reading database ... 517038 files and directories currently installed.)
>Unpacking vivaldi-stable (from vivaldi-stable_2.1.1337.36-1_i386.deb) ...
>
>dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of vivaldi-stable:
> vivaldi-stable depends on libappindicator3-1; however:
> Package libappindicator3-1 is not installed.
>
> vivaldi-stable depends on libc6 (>= 2.16); however:
> Version of libc6:i386 on system is 2.13-38+deb7u12.
>
> vivaldi-stable depends on libgtk-3-0 (>= 3.9.10); however:
> Version of libgtk-3-0:i386 on system is 3.4.2-7+deb7u1.
>
> vivaldi-stable depends on libpango-1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0); however:
> Package libpango-1.0-0 is not installed.
>
> vivaldi-stable depends on libpangocairo-1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0); however:
> Package libpangocairo-1.0-0 is not installed.
>
>dpkg: error processing vivaldi-stable (--install):
> dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
>Processing triggers for menu ...
>Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils ...
>Errors were encountered while processing:
> vivaldi-stable
>
>So its not going to work on a 32 bit wheezy, ever.
That's hardly a surprise. Wheezy was released over 5 years ago, and
isn't even in LTS any more.
>I'll update this machine to a 64 bit stretch if and when the network
>works again. Armbian is now working on a rock64, but thats the only
>variety of nix for arm64 that will accept and use a gateway statement
>in its net config
You keep on asserting this, but it's patently not true. That's a
standard feature of Debian on all architectures. I understand you've
seen problems, but it just needs debugging to see how things were
broken in your case. :-(
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
Reply to: