Re: How to react on a factually wrong Debian wiki change ?
On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 15:59:26 +0000, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net> wrote:
> >
> > Curt wrote:
> >> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
> >> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
> >
> > Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >> I opted to restore the text exactly as it was (a pure revert) rather
> >> than improve upon it, although I'm not really sure why I rationalised
> >> that.
> >
> > So how should the statement be improved ?
>
> "should better not be used" is a bit twisted.
>
> You could say:
>
> It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media.
>
> Or:
>
> It's better to avoid using wodim when burning to DVD or BD media.
>
> Or:
>
> Wodim has proved less reliable when used with DVD or BD media and is
> best avoided when burning to those media.
The last statement is good and the one I'd be inclined to go with, maybe
qualifying "less" with "much".
--
Brian.
Reply to: