Re: How to react on a factually wrong Debian wiki change ?
On 2018-09-28, Thomas Schmitt <scdbackup@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Curt wrote:
>> > It's been reverted but as the formulation is a little awkward it's too
>> > bad we didn't take this opportunity to unawkwardate it.
>
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> I opted to restore the text exactly as it was (a pure revert) rather
>> than improve upon it, although I'm not really sure why I rationalised
>> that.
>
> So how should the statement be improved ?
"should better not be used" is a bit twisted.
You could say:
It is preferable not to use wodim for DVD or BD media.
Or:
It's better to avoid using wodim when burning to DVD or BD media.
Or:
Wodim has proved less reliable when used with DVD or BD media and is
best avoided when burning to those media.
I'm learning in real time that it's easy to criticize but harder to come
up with something yourself.
;-)
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
--
"Now she understood that Anna could not have been in lilac, and that her charm
was just that she always stood out against her attire, that her dress could
never be noticeable on her." Leo Tolstoy, Anna Karenina
Reply to: