[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: question about ls

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> wrote:
On 26/09/2018 10:55, Long Wind wrote:
> sorry! you're right.
> after checking ls manual, i find ls has option -1

Note also that ls will behave like it has the "-1" option if its output
is piped to another command, even without this option. I like to use the
"-1" option even in this case because it is what I mean (counting
entries one per line).

But also note the difference when using the letter "l" vs the numeral "1":

westk@westkbox:/opt$ ls -la | wc
     7      56     321
westk@westkbox:/opt$ ls -1a | wc  
     6       6      54

The difference is that the letter includes the total count of blocks used at the top of the list (adding one to the count), whereas the numeral does not.

Kent West                    <")))><
Westing Peacefully - http://kentwest.blogspot.com

Reply to: