[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mailing list vs "the futur"



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 02:19:49PM +0200, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Friday, 10 Aug 2018 at 12:42, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [1] I know what I'm talking about: I've watched the slow and painful
> >    process of replacing mail with something more "modern" (O365) in
> >    a big corp, and the underhanded tactics of badmouthing and
> >    marginalizing fueled by a Microsoft-supported "team".
> 
> +1.
> 
> I've been forced to use O365 at work.  Luckily, there's still pop access
> to this so I can manage my email with the tools I want (which, in my
> case, is gnus in Emacs giving me splitting, adaptive scoring,
> expiry, ...; YMMV).

In my case they even had imap running (guess they didn't know [2]...)

Cheers

[2] Although with the years, I am more and more prone to what I call
   tomas's bastard: "Any sufficiently advanced malice can't be
   distinguished from stupidity" -- a kind of unholy cross-over
   between Hanlon's Razor and Clarke's Third Law. Some call this
   "plausible deniability", I guess.

- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAltu4/gACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaB2ACfV3DdaKlCAyevZaOBA7Dy9cny
DBMAni8bBidpQp+41ThJvAxFKwYrorvy
=FKes
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: