Re: increasing size of /run

To: Curt <curty@free.fr>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: increasing size of /run
From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 14:57:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20180713125704.GA3298648@phare.normalesup.org>
Reply-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrnpkh4vk.1ta.curty@einstein.electron.org>
References: <[🔎] aed0ecae-f058-e958-6f59-9b9016f8d4d4@matrixscience.com> <[🔎] 20180713102956.GA3194352@phare.normalesup.org> <[🔎] slrnpkh4vk.1ta.curty@einstein.electron.org>

Curt (2018-07-13):
> Why not (not a rhetorical question)?

Because requiring unusual system configuration for user programs is not
convenient in the long run.

Regards,

-- 
  Nicolas George

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- increasing size of /run
  - From: Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com>
- Re: increasing size of /run
  - From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
- Re: increasing size of /run
  - From: Curt <curty@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: Looking for ratings of all-in-one printers for Linux (Ubuntu in particular)
Next by Date: Re: increasing size of /run
Previous by thread: Re: increasing size of /run
Next by thread: Re: increasing size of /run
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread