Re: Debian glossary?
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Debian glossary?
- From: David Wright <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:28:36 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20180501002836.GB13532@alum>
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On Mon 30 Apr 2018 at 15:15:41 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/30/2018 11:58 AM, Brian wrote:
> >On Mon 30 Apr 2018 at 09:27:02 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>You have identified a documentation bug!
> >No, I haven't. You may think *you* have, but you haven't.
> >>The relevant line of the HTML of
> >>https://manpages.debian.org/stretch/coreutils/ls.1.en.html is
> >>GNU coreutils online help: <<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/">http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/</a>
> >>and www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ gives no navigational guidance.
> *YOU* have identified a bug.
> Just not the one either of us thought we were discussing.
I only saw a misunderstanding of how man pages impart information.
> Carefully read the quoted HTML.
> There be a missing "ls".
I'm not in the habit of reading HTML but I went to your reference
and it looks like your quotation is rendered as:
GNU coreutils online help: <http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/>
This is exactly what's written at the end of the local man page too.
Clicking on this link takes me (after allowing an automatic redirect) to:
where there's a bug reporting section a little over halfway down the page:
If you think you have found a bug in Coreutils, then …
> I suspect a corrupt mirror.
Why? Where is the "ls" string missing from?
> Have *NO* idea how to verify.
> Will try at a similar time tomorrow.
You can compare the webpage above with the output of
$ man ls
yourself at any time of day.
> Is there any way to establish *EXACTLY* which mirror I'm viewing?