Re: Upgrading to stretch (jessie-backports question)

[John Naggets <hostingnuggets@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Tom Furie <tom@furie.org.uk> wrote:

> Is there a reason not to switch to your backports source to stretch at
> the same time as the others?

If I understand correctly doing that I will end up with the ZFS
packages for unstable (Debian 10) after running a dist-upgrade? Is my
understanding correct?

Currently I have the following packages from jessie-backports:

ii  dh-python                        2.20170125~bpo8+1
all          Debian helper tools for packaging Python libraries and
applications
ii  dkms                             2.3-2~bpo8+1
all          Dynamic Kernel Module Support Framework
ii  libnvpair1linux                  0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
amd64        Solaris name-value library for Linux
ii  libuutil1linux                   0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
amd64        Solaris userland utility library for Linux
ii  libzfs2linux                     0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
amd64        OpenZFS filesystem library for Linux
ii  libzpool2linux                   0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
amd64        OpenZFS pool library for Linux
ii  spl                              0.6.5.9-1~bpo8+1
amd64        Solaris Porting Layer user-space utilities for Linux
ii  spl-dkms                         0.6.5.9-1~bpo8+1
all          Solaris Porting Layer kernel modules for Linux
ii  zfs-dkms                         0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
all          OpenZFS filesystem kernel modules for Linux
ii  zfs-zed                          0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
amd64        OpenZFS Event Daemon
ii  zfsutils-linux                   0.6.5.9-2~bpo8+1
amd64        command-line tools to manage OpenZFS filesystems