On 12/30/17 01:26, Matthew Crews wrote: >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: Experiences with BTRFS -- is it mature enough for enterprise use? >> Local Time: December 29, 2017 4:48 PM >> UTC Time: December 29, 2017 11:48 PM >> From: jan@jvales.net > >> You still can go md-raid + btrfs, if you want some btrfs features. > > If you're using Raid1 or Raid10, md-raid + btrfs is probably worse than native btrfs Raid1 + Raid10. > The problem with btrfs-raid10 (with 6 disks): it self-destructed itself on our soon to be production server twice in december. So no way btrfs-raid is going to see production on our machines anytime soon. It seems to work without issues on md-raid6 + luks + btrfs so far... So hopefully we will at least have snaphots <3 Its just a file/backup-server and nothing that would need best disk performance - if we wanted that, we would have gone for ssd's. :) br, Jan Vales -- I only read plaintext emails.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature