Re: Decentralized reliable instant messaging?
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:21:22PM +0000, Amir H. Firouzian wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:12:36PM +0000, Amir H. Firouzian wrote:
> > > It's not my point of view, It's P2P philosophy.
> > LOL, you really crack me up. P2P philosophy? Seriously?
> > Is that taught at some university? Can you have a P2PhD there?
>
> * Go and visit MIT for CS (& wish that I will visit too!).
> http://freehaven.net/
>
>
Ok, that is ONE! P2P project which happen to have these values you claim
are universal to P2P in general. I am happy that you found an existing
project which aligns with your personal "philosophy" that however doesn't
make this universal to all P2P. So it is a personal opinion.
>
> >
> >
> > > if you consider the project that try to collect Internet Informations;
> > This
> > > philosophy seems to be rational.
> >
> > And this sentence doesn't even make sense.
> > What project?
> > And if there is a "project" how does the existence automatically imply that
> > it is the highest priority to prevent this from happening
> >
> > * First, Sensation
>
> needs Informations
>
> . Second, N
> owadays
> "Project" isn't so
> secret
> !
>
Can you be more opaque?
What the hell are you talking about? And define how to come from the
existence of a "project" to come to a mandatory value hierachy.
-H
--
Henning Follmann | hfollmann@itcfollmann.com
Reply to: