Re: Decentralized reliable instant messaging?

["Amir H. Firouzian" <firouziyan@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> wrote:

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:12:36PM +0000, Amir H. Firouzian wrote:
> It's not my point of view, It's P2P philosophy.
LOL, you really crack me up. P2P philosophy? Seriously?
Is that taught at some university? Can you have a P2PhD there?

​* Go and visit MIT for CS (& wish that I will visit too!). http://freehaven.net/

​

 

> if you consider the project that try to collect Internet Informations; This
> philosophy seems to be rational.

And this sentence doesn't even make sense.
What project?
And if there is a "project" how does the existence automatically imply that
it is the highest priority to prevent this from happening

​* First, Sensation ​

 

​needs Informations

​

​. Second, N

owadays

 "Project" isn't so 

secret

​!​

>

PS.: Please don't top post. Especially not if someone already posted an
answer below.

​* Excuse for that :)​

 

-H

--
Henning Follmann           | hfollmann@itcfollmann.com