Re: Decentralized reliable instant messaging?
On Tue 30 Aug 2016 at 19:31:08 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Just out of interest, why have you sent a personal copy of a reply to the
> Debian list about an email of David Wright's to me, which is an irrelevant
> flouting of the code of conduct rules??? ;-) It's not like you Brian to make
> Human Errors. ;-)
So I did. Apologies.
I make errors all the time; I just fight a good rearguard action. :) But
not this time; surrender is the honorable course of action.
2016-08-30 18:45:35 1ben6M-0008JJ-JK => lisi.reisz@gmail.com R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.167.26] X=TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128 DN="C=US,ST=California,L=Mountain View,O=Google Inc,CN=mx.google.com" C="250 2.0.0 OK 1472579135 u10si39132321wje.183 - gsmtp"
2016-08-30 18:45:50 1ben6M-0008JJ-JK => debian-user@lists.debian.org R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp H=bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100] X=TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128 DN="C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=bendel.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@bendel.debian.org" C="250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 147DD63"
2016-08-30 18:45:50 1ben6M-0008JJ-JK Completed
I must have hit "r" or "g" in mutt. Damn these two bottles of wine. :)
> Lisi
>
> I tried to send this to you personally, by both routes readily available to
> me, but your email set-up kept rejecting it. So here is my (mild) protest
> publicly. ;-)
What were the two readily available routes open to you? Which addresses?
Reply to: