[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level directory



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:42:33 -0500
rhkramer@gmail.com wrote:

>I've been googling to try to answer this question, so far, no luck.
>
>I recall that there is (or used to be?) a limit on the number of files in the 
>top level directory of a FAT32 (or 16?) partition / drive.  If you needed to 
>have more files in a directory, you had to create a subdirectory (and, as I 
>recall, there was no limit on the number of files in a subdirectory).
>
>Does anybody else (reading this) recall that, and recall more details, like 
>the maximum number of files and which FAT systems (32 or 16) this applied to, 
>and, further, is it still a limit on FAT32?
>
>The limit might have existed in FAT12 as well (or some similar limit), but as 
>I recall it was in FAT16 or later.
>

You are correct in the limit in the root directory. I thought the limit
was 128 files/directories, but I could be wrong. I believe the limit
was when using FAT 16. FAT 32 raised this limit, but I don't remember
the numbers, since by then I was using sub-directories to insure never
hitting the limit. 

- -- 
Charlie Kravetz
Linux Registered User Number 425914
[http://linuxcounter.net/user/425914.html]
Never let anyone steal your DREAM.   [http://keepingdreams.com]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEG5QK93YKrQMH22ZTiq6LjqbJ0IAFAlhJasgACgkQiq6LjqbJ
0ICJawgAmykBStEEUV6pezM8Txi4qS29U0PvjMUSKK7mHsLOw1JnXcHqxMoJpOsh
N6SQ76C2J+1QPvKHUdyYuR8ZecoKxaehyEXPccYtV8eMSvPVo8CWXE4rjjdiAxgP
Ww4IknQJWCc8Qsh2BG8F6FglVx+RS/ij62phTT/qOf/2aPG89T/w3Psi/acGt2Y9
+XwMoKGKrqbDRK8NzyWk0fb5XYqvqvYmzCDGGvsCtWzXswsJFzRan18YnFcB43KN
ZggbqgG8YGDWMFxIJcsuMPKrOt5fCLLgysNTcAEeBhlNIUPf0Cl9ZFPUkXqWqc7Y
cgUo0ZuwR8nCUVfXDqrBFvKgFlOMgA==
=L0dZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: