Re: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?

[<tomas@tuxteam.de>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:38:39PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >> [...] it merely indicates your incompetence.
> > >
> > > Folks, I'm out of this thread.
> >
> > So what ever B**** says goes?
> > Please *NO* !!!!!
> 
> Richard - this snipping is very misleading.  It was not Tomas whom Brian was 
> calling incompetent - in fact, quite the opposite.  I can't quite see why 
> Tomas has taken such fright, except that both the others were putting things 
> rather strongly.  But *nothing* that Brian said could reasonably have been 
> interpreted, as you appear to have done, as Brian telling Tomas to leave the 
> thread.

Exactly, Lisi. I'm too old to watch people slinging mud at each other
("asshole", "incompetent") like kids. I mean, I feel strongly about
software, that's why I'm here, and I feel strongly about free software
and its social value, but my time is just too precious for that nonsense.

So you got it right.

thanks+regards
- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAldCrDgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaO4wCff5xslfxpg+i+or1fmMiGrVOx
lF8An2YDene9dVnT5WQQPsmxm/jGsqf5
=VHkD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----