Re: Got that network problem solved, now a new one
On Thursday 19 May 2016 09:04:54 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 19 May 2016 12:25:41 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 May 2016 05:56:49 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:48:19 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > Yes, its the link in the sig.
> > >
> > > Which has been unreachable all morning from here. :-( (Morning by
> > > BST=UTC+1)
> > >
> > > Lisi
> >
> > Thats Lisi, I'll check that out when I wake up again. Bad night,
> > leg cramps, took big B-12, should kick in shortly.
> >
> > Looking at port forwarding rule, protocol is html, incoming address
> > is blank, source port is 6309, fwd is to this machines address on
> > port 80. Enabled, so it should Just Work(TM). But I reset it, then
> > restored my config again. I checked the dns, and it resolves
> > correctly.
> >
> > Let me know if it still doesn't work.
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> Will reply to Gene off-list as well in order to send a screenshot.
> But no, it is still not working. Tried in Chromium and Firefox.
>
> Lisi
For those following along, I had apache2 listening on port 6309, and the
router was miss-set to port 80. Ooops. PEBBAK? Access.log is now now
showing some activity.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Reply to: