[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: swap on second hard drive



On 19/05/16 06:46, deloptes wrote:
> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
> 
>> On 18/05/16 22:02, deloptes wrote:
>>> Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 17/05/16 18:02, Felix Miata wrote:
>>>>> Peter Hillier-Brook composed on 2016-05-17 16:41 (UTC+0100):
>>>>>
>>>>>> I recently re-formatted and re-partitioned a second disk that I use
>>>>>> for experimenting with various distributions. A consequence is that
>>>>>> previous UUIDs have disappeared into the bit bucket but, during
>>>>>> booting of my main system a script somewhere is trying to use the swap
>>>>>> partition that used to exist on the second disk.
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is not a major problem, as the system boots after a 90 second
>>>>>> delay for a start job that is never going to start and a dependency
>>>>>> failure message is output, but I would like to find and fix the
>>>>>> problem. Can anyone offer a pointer to a likely source?
>>>>>
>>>>> That was happening here last summer:
>>>>> https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936964
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe all that's needed to fix it is initrd rebuilding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mounting by UUID is an optional default. Mounting life is simpler here,
>>>>> because I don't use UUID mounting on any of my hundreds of multiboot
>>>>> installations. Most of my mounts are by LABEL, strings I as a fallible
>>>>> human choose and can remember, according to usage, disk name and/or
>>>>> hostname.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the very useful pointers. I don't know who is the culprit,
>>>> but fstab has an entry for swap with a UUID that is not consistent with
>>>> the actual UUID for the swap partition. I'm going with your advice and
>>>> switch to using labels.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>> Peter HB
>>>
>>> UUID is better flexible solution in many cases - why not updating fstab
>>> to have the correct uuid?
>>
>> Because I prefer an identifier that I can remember. :-)
> 
> Haha, that's fair enough. It took me about 1h to reverse the setup to paper,
> that I have done few years ago on one server with 12disks
> Not only uuid, but crypt and lvm on top. I finally draw a map with this.
> I suggest not relaying on memory anyway ;-)

My memory has been working hard for very nearly 80 years, so I don't
(can't) rely on it. :-)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: