On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 12:42:16 -0400 Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi... > > Gábor's question, "What is cisco-sccp?" [1], just triggered a thought. > Who has Ian's [2] computers? Were they preserved in their last used > state as one might surely expect to be done with respect to someone of > his tech value and history? I don't understand the relevance of the links you posted. I don't understand your thought process in going from a question asking what Cisco SCCP is to suddenly pondering what could have happened to imurdock's computers. Care to elaborate as to how you got from point A to point B? I'm pretty sure his computers would have passed on to next-of-kin, or whoever else he specified in his will. Whether those people decide to preserve them or not is up to them. > Most unhumbly... if it has not already been done, his daily, personal > equipment needs scrutinized for ANY signs of stealth.... *leeching* > type _intrusion_ that would have occurred from within a few feet of > his home. > > It's a no-brainer that his equipment was likely scoured for last days > of correspondence but not necessarily for whether he had been [jail > broken] by neighbors somehow. I'm talking about just out right [tick > ant] "leeching", NOT "espionage" type behavior.... In the sense of "unauthorised use of WiFi" type leeching? I don't really follow. What would Ian's neighbours tapping into his resources have had to do with him killing himself? > As a potential... explanation. For his suicide? > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/04/msg00123.html > > [2] Wed, 2 Feb 94 19:16 PST with Ian saying, "[A]fter Mike and I open > a PO Box tomorrow we're going to announce the existence of <whatever > the Debian organization is named these days>." > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/1994/02/msg00046.html
Attachment:
pgpIQB5a3zAQN.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature