[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)



On 2016-01-06 22:09:25 -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:
> 
> > 70-persistent-net.rules contains:
> > 
> > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="30:8d:99:25:ad:3f", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> > 
> > Still the same question: why eth0 only?
> 
> Because the ethernet interface is the only one mentioned in 70-persistent-net.rules.

But my question is: Why is the ethernet interface the only one
mentioned in 70-persistent-net.rules?

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


Reply to: