[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0 (second try)



On Thu 07 Jan 2016 at 10:45:20 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

> On 2016-01-06 22:09:25 -0800, Rick Thomas wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:49 PM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > 70-persistent-net.rules contains:
> > > 
> > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="30:8d:99:25:ad:3f", ATTR{dev_id}=="0x0", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
> > > 
> > > Still the same question: why eth0 only?
> > 
> > Because the ethernet interface is the only one mentioned in 70-persistent-net.rules.
> 
> But my question is: Why is the ethernet interface the only one
> mentioned in 70-persistent-net.rules?

Pass. 70-persistent-net.rules was generated on Jessie and carried over
to testing. You would need a Jessie install on the same machine to
investigate.


Reply to: