[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: reply styles, family matters

On 01/12/15 11:56, John Hasler wrote:
> Bob Bernstein writes:
>> With that as background, here is my question/request: is anyone aware
>> of a spirited defence of our ideal method of "selective quoting," (for
>> lack of a better label) one, say, that perhaps has achieved the status
>> of a "net classic?" Surely some 'net genius has dealt these
>> nay-sayers, who seem to LIKE top-posting, a solid uppercut?
> Waste of effort.  The usual reason for top-posting (or bottom-posting
> without editing) is laziness.

I often counter that by passing my would-be reply through tac and
top-post it that way.

Then they see it from my perspective.
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)

I haven't lost my mind...
  ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: