On 01/12/15 11:56, John Hasler wrote: > Bob Bernstein writes: >> With that as background, here is my question/request: is anyone aware >> of a spirited defence of our ideal method of "selective quoting," (for >> lack of a better label) one, say, that perhaps has achieved the status >> of a "net classic?" Surely some 'net genius has dealt these >> nay-sayers, who seem to LIKE top-posting, a solid uppercut? > > Waste of effort. The usual reason for top-posting (or bottom-posting > without editing) is laziness. > I often counter that by passing my would-be reply through tac and top-post it that way. Then they see it from my perspective. -- Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL) I haven't lost my mind... ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature