Re: OT: reply styles, family matters
Bob Bernstein writes:
> With that as background, here is my question/request: is anyone aware
> of a spirited defence of our ideal method of "selective quoting," (for
> lack of a better label) one, say, that perhaps has achieved the status
> of a "net classic?" Surely some 'net genius has dealt these
> nay-sayers, who seem to LIKE top-posting, a solid uppercut?
Waste of effort. The usual reason for top-posting (or bottom-posting
without editing) is laziness.
--
John Hasler
jhasler@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
Reply to: