Re: systemd alternative for Jessie?
Hi.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:36:40 +0100
Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 October 2015 17:06:09 Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:18:23 +0100
> >
> > Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 October 2015 10:33:48 tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > That depends on your expectations wrt desktop. If you target a fat DE,
> > > > it'll be difficult (for Gnome perhaps nigh impossible dunno).
> > >
> > > I understood that Gnome3 depends on systemd.
> >
> > That's not correct assumption (as of jessie, at least).
>
> It's not an assumption. I just understood that that was the case because
> someone had said it. I do not use it, and don't mind about it, so hadn't
> checked. The only thing I assumed about Gnome3 was that I wouldn't like it,
> and when I saw it I didn't.
I quit using Gnome back in '07. But to answer whenever X depends on Y
one does not need to use X or Y. 'apt-cache' or two is usually enough.
> Is it the case in Sid or Stretch? Question, not assumption.
A quick glance on "gdm3" and "gnome-shell" dependencies shows that
things are the same in current testing and sid as of now.
As you surely know, everything in testing or sid is changing
constantly, so I won't rely on this in the long run if I was you.
Reco
Reply to: