Re: gnome ( panel ) question
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:03:15AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Chris Bannister (cbannister@slingshot.co.nz):
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 08:45:32PM +0300, moxalt wrote:
> > > If GNOME is working fine without it, then I doubt you need it. I think
> > > gnome-panel is for GNOME Classic or some such thing, but I'm not sure.
> >
> > What is the context of this mail?
> > *Baffled!*
>
> Both my email copy and the web version show that it's a reply to the
> posting that it is In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1444563663.2010.4.camel@gmx.de>
> not surprisingly. Have you lost your threading facility?
No, but I don't keep whole threads, normally there is enough context
where you don't have to.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: