[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Enscript and unicode, was Re: is a2ps broken?



On 2015-09-16 14:01:40 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> It doesn't crash, and the frames you have specified don't get bumped
> into AFAICT, but a test line of unicode with:
> 
> Pound £ Euro € Divide ÷
> 
> gives me:
> 
> Pound £ Euro â\202¬ Divide ÷
> 
> There'a a good testpage to try at
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/UTF-8-demo.txt

And FYI, the bug report (more than 11 years ago!):

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=229595

For printing, I'm using paps as a replacement for a2ps. But this is
mainly for printing, as contrary to a2ps, paps does not generate text
in the PostScript output (it converts the text with pango).

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)


Reply to: