[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 32to64 decision



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:17:56AM +0300, Mailing Lists wrote:
> i have an old small office server providing dhcp/dns/squid/custom cyrus
> debs/postfix/samba services which at the time of lenny did not have enough
> ram to choose the 64bit version.
> now that i've managed to get more ram into it i'd like to migrate it to
> 64bit. nothing really requires 64bit but rather i feel more peace of mind
> knowing i'm getting rid of the last 32bit box.
> 
> which path should i choose:
> 
> wheezy32 > wheezy64 > jessie64
> OR
> wheezy32 > jessie32 > jessie64?
> 
> which one should be easier?
> 
> I previously did a wheezy32 > wheezy64 for it's backup box and went ok,

As an old fart, I'd suggest wheezy32 -> wheezy64 -> jessie64, on the
premise that most transitions 32 -> 64 so-far happened on wheezy's
lifetime, and so both edges of that path are probably the most-tested
ones...

Take that with a grain of salt: just hunch and old scars, no concrete
knowledge.

- -- t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlVxTdgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kaxegCfQByrZY5du/rlN1MNkRNLtDnq
nREAn1dAsqHOg43SSV9XoliEIk1uo1e3
=Rj9u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: