[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: HELP- very slow download speeds



On 05/24/2015 12:49 AM, Petter Adsen wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2015 00:27:02 -0700
Gary Roach <gary719_list1@verizon.net> wrote:

On 05/22/2015 01:19 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Darac Marjal wrote:
Gary Roach wrote:
When I start a download, it starts at 50M for the first few
seconds and then drops to 500K to 100K range.
Finally, don't rule out the possibility that your ISP is throttling
you. While you may be synced at 50M and may be able to transfer at
that for short periods (and thus, the ISP can rightly claim that
you have a 50M connection), they could conceivably throttle your
connection in the longer term.
I think this is quite the most likely possibility.  I have only
anecdotal reports from friends but what I hear is that often ISPs
allow a full speed burst but then throttle for long term steady
state data transfer.  That matches your reported behavior exactly.
This allows customers to run a speed test and have it report full
speed but prevent them from getting that speed for a long download
such as a full system upgrade or a large install ISO image
download.  Are you sure your ISP isn't throttling you?

Bob
I wouldn't put anything past those jackasses but am still attempting
to gather information. Would wireshark be a good tool to do an in
depth diagnosis of the problem? I've gotten a little side tracked
with another problem but plan to get back to this  in the next couple
of days. Any comments will be appreciated.
If you have shell access to a box somewhere, you can run "iperf" to get
an idea of the performance of the link between you. Obviously, the
closer to you, the better. Take a look at the "--interval" parameter,
so you can see how/if performance degrades over time. "--dualtest"
might also be helpful. There are probably guides out there on how to
get the best results from it, the man page doesn't really do much
except list all the options.

There may be better ways, but this is the one I typically use. Wireshark
would be more suited to analyze the actual traffic, if you suspect
something may be wrong there.

Petter

Thanks for the tips. Don't go away. As you will find in the newest listings, I have a bigger problem at the moment. I will be back to this one soon.

Comment on speed testers. The mostly use UDP packets which will never detect trashed packets. God I hate big business in this country. What ever happened to the antitrust laws I grew up with.

Gary R



Reply to: