Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
On Tuesday 14 April 2015 20:11:30 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 14 Apr 2015 at 15:32:47 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:09:46PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > Quoting Brian (ad44@cityscape.co.uk):
> > > > On Mon 13 Apr 2015 at 12:00:52 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > …
> >
> > > > > So the most I could do is set up an account just to write "This
> > > > > list entry may mislead you" on the page.
> >
> > …
> >
> > > > You could do better than that :). It took half a minute to discover
> > > > that the "GNOME accessibility" entry needs removing or the entry
> > > > adjusted to reflect what version of Debian it applies to. Following
> > > > the link is sufficient to see why.
> >
> > I've fixed the gnome-core definition on that page in less time than it
> > took to read any of the last three messages in this sub-thread, and
> > therefore certainly less time than it took to write them, using only
> > information gleaned from posts in this thread. In other words, any one of
> > you could have done it just as well.
>
> There is no arguing with that; we are pleased you found the information
> useful. This is an excellent example illustrating how the interaction
> between Debian users leads to a change and an improvement.
Yes, but it now needs something about accessibility. Accessibility is one of
Gnome's strengths, and as this site was before it only took a click on the
provided link to get all the information. I think that the change is
detrimental.
Lisi
Reply to: