Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
[I'm hoping this isn't a duplicate post, but my first
attempt was rejected by bendel.debian.org as forged.]
Quoting Patrick Bartek (nemommxiv@gmail.com):
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015, briand@aracnet.com wrote:
> > i'll second the use of openbox. i use it with fbpanel.
> >
> > i too believe that gnome just pulls in way too much "stuff".
> >
> > the most inconvenient thing about not using gnome is not having a
way
> > to handle USS mass storage devices.
>
> I wrote a generic udev rule for that. Of course, there are also
> mounting utilities that do the same thing. But I opted for the
> light-on-resources rule instead.
Care to share it?
Cheers,
David.
Reply to: