Re: Is gnome-core *really* the gnome minimal install?
[I'm hoping this isn't a duplicate post, but my first
attempt was rejected by bendel.debian.org as forged.]
Quoting Patrick Bartek (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015, email@example.com wrote:
> > i'll second the use of openbox. i use it with fbpanel.
> > i too believe that gnome just pulls in way too much "stuff".
> > the most inconvenient thing about not using gnome is not having a
> > to handle USS mass storage devices.
> I wrote a generic udev rule for that. Of course, there are also
> mounting utilities that do the same thing. But I opted for the
> light-on-resources rule instead.
Care to share it?