Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?
Le 06/03/2015 21:22, Miles Fidelman a écrit :
> Brian wrote:
>> On Fri 06 Mar 2015 at 09:27:23 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015, Ken Heard wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks everybody for the collected wisdom. So for me now Jessie RC1
>>>> is it.
>>> FYI: Do daily updates using dist-upgrade, instead of upgrade (or the
>>> equivalent with aptitude, if you use that). Things change quickly and
>>> sometimes majorly on the path to Stable. You'll want to get ALL those
>>> changes -- minor and major. "Upgrade" won't do that. This is
>>> recommended by Debian. Once Jessie is Stable, revert to "upgrade" for
>>> the most part.
>> I agree with everything but the final sentence. Stable is unlikely to
>> pull in any new packages but if it does you will likely need them.
>> In other words, 'dist-upgrade' should be the norm for stable.
>>
>
> Somehow, anything that needs daily updates, or upgrades, does not meet
> any definition of "stable" that I'm familiar with.
>
> Miles Fidelman
>
>
>
>
It does not need daily update. But some update must be done ASAP...
Reply to: