Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?
From: Ken Heard <kenslists@teksavvy.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:40:25 +0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 54F921A9.9060803@teksavvy.com>
Reply-to: kenslists@teksavvy.com
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 54F7EA91.7030002@teksavvy.com>
References: <[🔎] 54F7EA91.7030002@teksavvy.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thanks everybody for the collected wisdom.  So for me now Jessie RC1
is it.

Regards, Ken

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlT5IagACgkQlNlJzOkJmTenMACcDU5QwjjiXzegcr6Q5cpvQwHQ
XzcAn1sZx8xsKPGyJjHcSe2CT/GI0zuF
=jXiT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?
  - From: Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com>

References:
- Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?
  - From: Ken Heard <kenslists@teksavvy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: My Friends Make Fun of My UI
Next by Date: Re: My Friends Make Fun of My UI
Previous by thread: Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?
Next by thread: Re: Jessie sufficiently stable for general use?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread