Re: SCIM - terminal spreadsheet - sc fork
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:01:22AM +0100, Christian Groessler wrote:
> Why not just keep the original name, "sc"?
>
> I don't think it's actively developed elsewhere, so the new improved version
> could be distinguished by the version number.
That sounds like a recipe for confusion. Some people, no doubt still use
the old version.
Is there any software that has done this? AFAIK, all forks have changed
the name.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: