Re: If Not Systemd, then What?
Le 16/11/2014 19:22, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, Klistvud wrote:
>
>> Dne, 21. 10. 2014 04:06:23 je Marty napisal(a):
>>> On 10/20/2014 03:45 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>>> After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to
>>>> systemd, I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't
>>>> be sysvinit.
>> Why not? I do not see sysvinit -- or any other legacy init system,
>> for that matter -- as contradicting the following:
> Systemd is intended as a "modern" replacement for sysvinit. I wanted
> to know if not systemd, what init others would choose to replace
> sysvinit. Simple question. Difficult to answer.
>
> B
>
>
Please define "modern". And no, new is not equivalent of better.
Reply to: