Re: If Not Systemd, then What?
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 21. 10. 2014 04:06:23 je Marty napisal(a):
> > On 10/20/2014 03:45 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> After much vitriolic gnashing of teeth from those opposed to
> >> systemd, I wonder... What is a better alternative? And it can't
> >> be sysvinit.
>
> Why not? I do not see sysvinit -- or any other legacy init system,
> for that matter -- as contradicting the following:
Systemd is intended as a "modern" replacement for sysvinit. I wanted
to know if not systemd, what init others would choose to replace
sysvinit. Simple question. Difficult to answer.
B
Reply to: