On 15-11-2014 16:59, Brian wrote:
On Sat 15 Nov 2014 at 15:22:06 +0200, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:On 15-11-2014 14:17, Brian wrote: >On Sat 15 Nov 2014 at 13:49:18 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >>On Vi, 14 nov 14, 08:04:00, Marty wrote: >>> >>> By the same token systemd is a major waste with no real gain. It duplicates >>> equivalent modular alternatives, and also requires unnecessary effort to >>> repair damage from excessive coupling. >> >>I challenge you to come up with a configuration that duplicates >>systemd's features with a combination of other software. > >One picture is worth a thousand words. > > https://np237.livejournal.com/34598.html > >(Sorry, couldn't resist). I couldn't resist also ... "A use case better covered by SysV init: encrypted block devices" http://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/categorie2/debianI'll see you and raise you with a link to a helpful post: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/04/msg01286.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg01048.html
Irrelevant ... Read carefullty " ... use case better covered ... ""if systemd requires specific configuration to handle such a case, whereas SysV init does not, that means this case is better covered by SysV init;"
systemd : "[Unit] Description=Unlock EncFS DefaultDependencies=no After=local-fs.target Before=display-manager.service getty@tty1.service [Service] Type=oneshot RemainAfterExit=true Environment=RootDir=/home/.encfs/crypt Environment=MountPoint=/home/crypt ExecStart=/bin/sh -c "systemd-ask-password --no-tty --timeout=30 'Unlock EncFS' | encfs --stdinpass $RootDir $MountPoint" ExecStop=/bin/umount $MountPoint [Install] WantedBy=sysinit.target" This is a specific configuration ... Any way thx for playing ... ( it was just humor ... ) Regards, -- Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis