Re: GR proposed re: choice of init systems
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:32:31AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Ludovic Meyer wrote:
> >>Even with the addition 10 to 20 people posting on systemd,
> >>it shouldn't be a issue.
> >Andrei's point was not that the list /infrastructure/ was at risk, but
> >that debian-user - this list - was essentially subject to a denial of
> >service, because it's main purpose - user support - was impeded by the
> >amount of systemd/-vote watching posts taking place.
> >
>
> Particularly all those posts by folks saying "don't talk about systemd" -
> seems to me there's about a 3-1 multiplier effect. Complain about systemd
> (or even ask about a problem with it) and 3-5 people immediately weigh in to
> simply say "shut up." Talk about DoS.
Can you cite a post where this actually happened? Posts about problems
(i.e. bugs) are welcomed. Possibly it got messed up in a thread taken
over by the anti-systemd vigilantes?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: