Re: Avoiding SystemD isn't hard
On 21 October 2014 17:40, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
> Liam Proven wrote:
>>
>> A blog post explaining why it isn't mandatory, the utter futility of
>> the fork and more besides, clearly and simply.
>>
>> http://www.vitavonni.de/blog/201410/2014102101-avoiding-systemd.html
>>
>
> Would be nicer if it was accurate.
>
> For example, it talks about version pinning as a way to prevent installation
> of systemd - except that version pinning doesn't effect the installer.
By definition, no. It cannot. If you're installing, it's a new system
and there is nothing to pin. Ergo your objection is egregious.
But there is a mandatory *choice* of init system during installation,
it says. Is that not true?
--
Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
Email: lproven@cix.co.uk • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
MSN: lproven@hotmail.com • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
Cell/Mobiles: +44 7939-087884 (UK) • +420 702 829 053 (ČR)
Reply to: