Re: GR proposed re: choice of init systems
On Friday, October 17, 2014 10:10:02 PM UTC+5:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
> > Rusi Mody wrote:
> >> On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> Now let's see what happens with this!
> >>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg00001.html
> >>> Very interesting discussion there. Thanks for posting.
> > Thank you Ian, and the seconders, and everyone who is speaking up for
> > (what I call) sanity.
> Still only 4 seconds though...
Here are the first few seconds:
Simon Richter
Alessio Treglia
Iustin Pop
Florian Lohoff
Jonas Smedegaard
At which point we have Neil McGovern saying
| Hi,
|
| This reached the required number of seconds at Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:42:55
| UTC, and thus the relevent minimum discussion period of two weeks has
| started.
|
| Neil
Seconds continue
Bernhard R. Link
Dimitri John Ledkov
Arnaud Fontaine
Thorsten Glaser
And once again loud cheers for Ian Jackson and the seconds
Some like Charles Plessy are distressed that this may be de-motivating,
delaying etc.
Yes that may be so and we should thank all DDs for their work.
However the contentiousness of this case clearly overrides the
need to hit deadlines
Reply to: