Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
On Tue, 10/14/14, Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:
Subject: Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2014, 12:22 PM
On Tue 14 Oct 2014 at 10:47:13 -0500, golinux@riseup.net wrote:
On Tue, 10/14/14, Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2014, 1:56 AM
You are still writing as if you are going to be forced to run
systemd, despite
being repeatedly told that multiple init systems will be supported.
I'm really
struggling to continue to presume "good faith" on your part now.
--------------------------------------------
It's about so much more than the choice of init systems. It's that
systemd shoots it's tentacles into DEs and applications. That's the
real problem. What's the point of having a non-systemd init system
if nothing will work on it? Those 'entanglements' are the real
lock-down.
On Debian we talk about dependencies. It would make things much more
understandable for everyone if you stuck with the same terminology.
--------------------------------------------
Ah so . . . ever heard of a 'rose by any other name'? Either way, the
problem remains the same so is this really about semantics?
Reply to: