Re: Recipient validation - WAS: Re: Moderated posts?
On 10/14/2014 1:31 PM, Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're talking past each other.
No, we're not, Jerry is arguing arguing against recipient validation on
mail servers, and I'm correcting some of the bad/mis-information he is
relying on when trying to support his argument.
> Still, the current "standard" e-mail protocols were never meant to be
> either reliable or secure, and their is a very good reason for that.
> People may not be as reliable as machines in executing protocols, but
> they cannot be 100% reliable, and only people can certify things.
And since neither of us said anything to the contrary, and in fact
admitted pretty much just that, your 'me too!' is duly noted.
Reply to: