Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 14/10/2014 5:47 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 13 oct 14, 12:34:27, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>
>> Again.. when did the desktop become the priority for Debian. For years,
>> Debian (and Linux in general) has been most useful in the server
>> environment. Breaking server deployments, at the expense of the desktop
>> seems like bad policy.
>
> Do you have any evidence of systemd breaking your setup? If yes, would
> you please be so kind to at least file corresponding bugs?
It is NOT just about whether a system breaks or not, there are more
considerations involved here.
Many don't want systemd for all sorts of reasons, system breakage or not
is just one reason.
systemd:
- adds much more than init NOW;
- aspires to add much more according to the developers website;
- one of the main devs failed many with Pulse Audio;
- one other main dev is refused kernel updates by Linus;
&
- production servers /may/ or may not be effected
- this risk /may/ be too much,
... it really is a significant change after all.
I'm sure there are many more reasons, but that's just a very quick dump
for a quick email.
A.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlQ8KF4ACgkQqBZry7fv4vvOjAD9G+Tqvn68c4HkX+x1mCkYTza3
ZtNTVg/+F8TLPyZO41kBAIouPH1lwgcrnNLhcv93ShUIcajdAqKYIVoU6rtlJLMR
=RCSC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: