Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 20:12:25 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 5424BD79.7020108@cloud85.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140925210215.GD1289@sid.nuvreauspam>
References: <[🔎] CALtyatFS_6jHmVkLnk7THKa=ZPzp__5d6u4cMkh3WgW_FgSAXA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAM5FmSODC_NqZCWXYP-1rrGY5gNAa=_hBr0TrTL4ftpSXzK2PQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 201409252101.30929.lisi.reisz@gmail.com> <[🔎] 20140925210215.GD1289@sid.nuvreauspam>

Andrei POPESCU wrote:

On Jo, 25 sep 14, 21:01:30, Lisi Reisz wrote:

On Thursday 25 September 2014 19:04:07 Hörmetjan Yiltiz wrote:

  even after 2/3 of active
Debian users in this list ask for it?


They haven't.  A few of you have.  Nothing like two thirds.


Just to put some numbers behind this: according to
https://lists.debian.org/stats/ this list has 3282 subscribers. That's
of course not counting all those reading it via newsgroups (most notable
Gmane), Google Groups, the list archives, etc.

Kind regards,
Andrei


I'm a subscriber.

My opinion is that systemd may break Debian attempting to solve anon-existent problem.


P.S. to Andrei

I'm still following up on your suggestion to investigatedeboostrap/multistrap.

Thank you
<GRIN>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Gregory Smith <gregorysmith1974a@gmail.com>
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Hörmetjan Yiltiz <hyiltiz@gmail.com>
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Question about the driver of wifi-card
Next by Date: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Previous by thread: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Next by thread: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread