Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
From: Lisi Reisz <lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 21:01:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 201409252101.30929.lisi.reisz@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAM5FmSODC_NqZCWXYP-1rrGY5gNAa=_hBr0TrTL4ftpSXzK2PQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CALtyatFS_6jHmVkLnk7THKa=ZPzp__5d6u4cMkh3WgW_FgSAXA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAM5FmSODC_NqZCWXYP-1rrGY5gNAa=_hBr0TrTL4ftpSXzK2PQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday 25 September 2014 19:04:07 Hörmetjan Yiltiz wrote:
>  even after 2/3 of active
> Debian users in this list ask for it?

They haven't.  A few of you have.  Nothing like two thirds.

Lisi

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Gregory Smith <gregorysmith1974a@gmail.com>
- Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
  - From: Hörmetjan Yiltiz <hyiltiz@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Let's have a vote! I was just banned from debian forum for posting a systemd critical message.
Next by Date: Re: chromium >= 37.0.2062.117 on i386
Previous by thread: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Next by thread: Re: Can't We Have Another Vote for Systemd (Coup)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread