[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?



On 09/24/2014 02:45 PM, Brian wrote:

Chanting "Red Hat Conspirancy" to yourself before falling into a deep
slumber is one thing. Convincing most other people it exists is a task
which requires a little bit more.

<FUD alert>

Let's see, the real goal of systemd has nothing to do with init or service management, but with IPC standardization, sandboxing apps and TC/DRM support, enabling an internet app store for Linux distros.

That requires a PID 1 kitchen sink service to drive its dependency chains deeply into userspace using at least 40 APIs.

Then just call it an "init" system and anyone opposing a luddite, manufacture a crisis by killing services it replaces and threaten the whole application stack. By then everyone has compared it with the old init, a perfect foil. While everyone is arguing about init systems, nobody will notice your original goal, but if they do just call it a paranoid conspiracy theory.

<sigh> you're right, too unbelievable. Back to Hanlon's razor. :)







Reply to: