Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:30:22AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:58:26PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>> > True, it's a single point of failure, but it's made by GNU, whose
>> > agenda is less harmful to Linux than the agenda of Redhat.
>>
>> I nearly choked on my coffee reading that. Redhat built their business on
>> Linux; GNU have been hostile towards it for years.
>
> And the most interesting thing is that for many years glibc was
> maintained by Ulrich "Stop Reopening" Drepper who was paid by Red Hat
> for this task :)
> Glibc maintainer style was the main reason of glibc → eglibc transition
> in Debian.
Just for fun, I did a search on "gnu vs. redhat".
One of the more amusing links that popped up:
http://www.informit.com/library/content.aspx?b=red_hat_linux7&seqNum=12
Irony abounds.
--
Joel Rees
Be careful where you see conspiracy.
Look first in your own heart,
and ask yourself if you are not your own worst enemy.
Reply to: